Yahoo! Is Now in the Daily Fantasy Business

You didn’t seriously expect Yahoo Sports to ignore the daily fantasy boom, did you?

That’s the first line of Yahoo!’s introduction to their newly-announced daily fantasy offering. It’s bluntness leans on the cute side, but it’s now without merit. Daily fantasy sports (DFS) seem to be exploding in popularity, and the funding numbers certainly back that up.

Yahoo! is going up against two well-established DFS platforms — FanDuel and DraftKings. Each have their own strengths and weaknesses, but what they both possess is strong market saturation. FanDuel, especially, has been making a huge push in partnerships of late, teaming up with both Major League Baseball and NASCAR. And it’s become increasingly difficult to watch any kind of sporting event without seeing commercials for either DraftKings or FanDuel. Yahoo! has an uphill climb ahead of them if they plan on making a big dent in the DFS market. But they do have a few aces up their sleeve.

Their first advantage is that that are already a huge player in the fantasy sports market. It’s true that their reputation has taken some hits as of late, but they’re still one of the big providers. Millions of traditional fantasy players are already visiting Yahoo! on a frequent basis. All Yahoo! has to do is entice them to give DFS a try (or seven). Whereas FanDuel or DraftKings have to either pay for advertising or enter in partnerships if they want exposure on the popular fantasy sites. Yahoo! has it all baked right in. They just have to convince people it’s worth a shot.

While it hasn’t been up long enough to do a full review, a quick glance at the new DFS site shows a nice, clean interface. The nuts and bolts of it work much like DraftKings or FanDuel, but Yahoo! is taking a different approach with their salary caps. Instead of working within a $50,000 cap, Yahoo! works within a $200 limit. Of course, everything is prorated. Instead of dropping $9,500 on a top-notch player, Yahoo! users would spend something like $60 within their lower cap limit. This is most likely a stab at simplicity — making the the financials easier to manage across a whole roster. It’s a novel idea, one that separates them from the rest of the field. We’ll have to see how it plays out as the season goes on.

yahoofantasy2

The first game of the NFL season comes on September 10th. The second half of the baseball season is clearly the proving grounds for Yahoo!’s new platform — a time to iron out all the bugs before the real money starts rolling in. Whether it works or not, you have to give Yahoo! credit for trying. DFS is eating into their user base and they’re making a move to try and stop the bleeding. Perhaps they can leverage their place in the market into some higher revenues. They certainly have the foothold. Being valued at $40 billion probably doesn’t hurt, either.





David G. Temple is the Managing Editor of TechGraphs and a contributor to FanGraphs, NotGraphs and The Hardball Times. He hosts the award-eligible podcast Stealing Home. Dayn Perry once called him a "Bible Made of Lasers." Follow him on Twitter @davidgtemple.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Beastie
8 years ago

Asking as a fantasy veteran who’s probably just getting old (almost 40): what’s the appeal of daily fantasy? It seems infuriating to me. Don’t we all have experience of manning a fantasy team and trying to guess who’s going to have a good day and getting burned by small sample craziness? Does it just let you step in and out of playing as you have time, versus a season long commitment?

Brian
8 years ago
Reply to  Beastie

DFS is fun if you take a barbell approach where you employ lineups that haves high ceilings and low floors. If you accept that you’ll lose 85% of the time in decent money events, but stick to a qualitative strategy you can come out ahead.

Chri
8 years ago
Reply to  Brian

Echoing what Beastie is saying. If its only 1 game, all players have hi ceilings and lo floors no?

MustBunique
8 years ago
Reply to  Beastie

I’ve been having this same conversation with a couple of my league mates who are big into daily. I always argue that the only way to do well over the course of a season is to play almost every day so that you are getting a larger number of games and stats will start to balance out the randomness of single days. They say that stacking lineups against the right conditions can work even on a daily level. They look at weather, wind, and splits. They are even looking at batter/pitcher matchups. I scream at them that there is so much randomness in the small samples of batter/pitcher matchups that they are fooling themselves, but that’s another argument. So, in conclusion, I’m not sold on it, and haven’t tried it. But I am thinking about it. I just have to think if I want to commit to doing it every single day so that the stats become less random in the long term.

Matt
8 years ago
Reply to  MustBunique

I played it in April, mostly in 50/50 games where I ended up losing almost my entire investment . But then I happened to enter a tournament where I finished 4th out of ~8000, which brought me back in the green although there was only a $1 entry fee so it wasn’t that much cash.

I’m not convinced that it’s profitable even if you’re playing with near-optimal lineups. The hosts take a huge rake and there’s just so much randomness. You really need to enjoy the gambling aspect to play long-term; I don’t derive anything from gambling and playing lessened my baseball experience since I’d always be stressed out while watching games.

Shawn
8 years ago
Reply to  Beastie

It’s a vehicle for gambling with a daily turnaround time.
The end.

Jason
8 years ago
Reply to  Shawn

Pretty much this.

As far as I can tell, DFS is for people who aren’t in Nevada. (I live in Nevada, so I can already gamble on games. )